Hadi, Zulpan and Murtiadi, Suryawan (2018) THE ENGINEERING DESIGN OF DECISION MAKING TOWARD THE STIPULATION OF EVALUATION METHODS IN THE BIDDING OF GOVERNMENT’S GOODS AND SERVICE PROCUREMENT IN THE REGENCY OF EAST LOMBOK. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology (IJCIET), 9 (7). pp. 1538-1545. ISSN 0976-6308
|
Text
12. The engineering design.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
In the evaluation of goods procurement applying knockout system, those offer which met administration, technic and the lowest cost will win the bid. Such system influenced dominantly toward the works quality as it offered the lowest price among other bidder. Meanwhile, the bidding evaluation applying grading system provides wider discretion for the committee to determine technical elements, grades of each element, also the score of each bidding contestants in each evaluated element. Vulnerability occurs in this stage, particularly related to the foundation of grade or scores granting, which consist of three vulnerable points, i.e. determination of rated elements, the value of each element and the score of contestant in each element. Aim of this research is to analyze characteristic differences between knockout and grading system (review list and passing grade) in a bidding evaluation in order to determine winning bidder of goods/services procurement in the regency of East Lombok and to determine most dominant factor influencing the appointment of the method. The research location is in the regency of East Lombok of West Nusa Tenggara province. To find out most dominant factor in the appointment of an appropriate bidding evaluation method, an approach under Analytic Hierarchy Process assistant is applied. The analysis reported that the most dominant criteria is evaluation result (17.2%), accuracy in choosing the service provider (15.5%), and contestant selection (15.1%). According to valuation result criteria, 85.5 % of the respondent selected bidding evaluation method applying scoring system and 14.5% selected knockout system. According to accuracy of service provider criteria, 87% selected grading system, 13% selected knockout system. Meanwhile, according contestant selection criteria, an amount of 79.5% respondent selected grading system and 20.5% selected knockout system. According to above percentage, it may conclude that in the regency of East Lombok, application of scoring evaluation method is more proper to be used instead of the knockout system.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Keywords (Kata Kunci): | AHP, Bidding Evaluation, Knockout System, Scoring System. |
| Subjects: | T Technology > TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) |
| Divisions: | Fakultas Teknik |
| Depositing User: | Dr. Suryawan Murtiadi |
| Date Deposited: | 12 Mar 2023 04:37 |
| Last Modified: | 12 Mar 2023 04:37 |
| URI: | http://eprints.unram.ac.id/id/eprint/35728 |
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
